What Comes After Digital Transformation?

ReadIndustry InsightsBest PracticesCool Animations
Written By Jeff Winter

After Digital Comes Intelligence

The last decade rewired business for the digital age. Data moved from shadows to center stage, processes left paper behind, and leaders learned to see their enterprise in high resolution. Digital was the foundation, not the finish. The strategic question for 2025 and beyond is simple and profound: what happens after Digital Transformation?

The answer is Intelligence Transformation (IX). It is the shift from systems that show us what is happening to systems that can think with us and, where it is safe and valuable, think for us. If Digital Transformation gave you clarity, Intelligence Transformation gives you velocity. It compresses the distance between sensing and acting, between “we know” and “we did.”

A Short History of Digital Transformation

Digital transformation started as a practical response to a simple reality: the analog world could not keep up with digital customers, digital competitors, and digital speed. It evolved in three steps. First came digitization, where paper turned into pixels and machines started speaking in data. Next came digitalization, where teams redesigned workflows for the medium, linked systems with APIs, and moved work out of email into orchestrated processes. The final step was true digital transformation, where leaders treated technology as the backbone of a new operating model rather than a project portfolio.

As far as I can tell, “Digital transformation” entered the scholarly record in 2004, when Erik Stolterman and Anna Croon Fors first used the phrase to describe changes caused by digital technology across all aspects of human life in their article ‘Information Technology and the Good Life’. That early framing set the stage for management practice later in the decade. The term crossed into the executive mainstream in 2011 with the MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini report that defined digital transformation as using technology to radically improve performance or reach. Executives were already deploying analytics, mobility, social, and smart embedded devices, while modernizing ERP, to reinvent customer relationships, internal processes, and value propositions. Then, in 2014 a MIT Sloan article called “The Nine Elements of Digital Transformation,” organized the agenda into customer experience, operations, and business models, which helped boards treat DX as an operating model shift, not an IT project.

What drove the shift

  • Mobile raised expectations for instant, personalized, always-on experiences

  • Cloud economics lowered the cost of scale and experimentation

  • Data flows expanded from ERP logs to IoT on the shop floor

  • Competition rewarded shorter cycle times and faster learning

  • Security, privacy, and regulatory pressure demanded stronger control

What companies prioritized

  • Modernizing core platforms so change became safer and faster

  • Building usable data foundations with shared definitions and near real-time access

  • Digitizing customer and partner channels to unify selling, service, and fulfillment

  • Automating routine work and instrumenting end-to-end processes for auditability

  • Centralizing monitoring across plants, fleets, and regions to spot issues early

  • Hardening identity, access, and governance so innovation did not become chaos

  • Adopting product operating models, agile, and DevOps to ship value continuously

The evolution followed a clear arc. Front doors came first because that is where pain and payoff were visible. The second wave moved into the engine room with planning, scheduling, inventory, and supplier collaboration. A third wave pressed into business models like subscriptions, platforms, and ecosystem plays once billing, identity, and data sharing were reliable. Metrics matured from vanity counts to time to value, lead time variance, cost to serve, and customer lifetime value. Talent shifted from project managers coordinating vendors to product leaders accountable for outcomes.

As a market, DX matured through the late 2010s when analysts began tracking spend at scale. According to IDC in 2024, the worldwide DX investment will beapproaching 4 trillion dollars by 2027, with regional forecasts that point to continued growth through 2028. The COVID shock then pulled the future forward. McKinsey back in 2020 reported that organizations vaulted several years ahead in digital adoption within months and that the pace stuck. Together these signals explain why “digital” evolved from project language into a permanent management discipline built on cloud, mobile, IoT, integration platforms, and modern data stacks.

Why it became one of the decade’s hottest topics is no mystery. It delivered measurable gains in speed, cost, quality, and experience. It proved its value in resilience when shocks hit. It became visible to boards, investors, and talent. The simple throughline still holds: the digital era makes data visible and processes digital. Once leaders embraced that idea, they stopped chasing tools and started designing systems, which set the stage for the intelligence era now rising.

A Short History of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Artificial intelligence has always been two stories at once. One is ambition: the 1956 Dartmouth Workshop, early perceptrons, expert systems that promised to encode human know‑how, and long winters when reality fell short. The other is compounding capability: machines beating chess champions in the 1990s, deep learning exploding after 2012, transformers rewriting the rules in 2017, and generative models in the 2020s turning language and code into programmable interfaces. Together they pushed AI from lab curiosity to economic engine.

hrough the 2010s, most enterprise AI meant prediction. Models classified, ranked, and forecast. They flagged fraud, scored leads, scheduled jobs, and found defects. Humans still decided. Then generative AI arrived with a different posture. It did not just predict a label. It produced content, explained options, wrote code, and started to look like a universal interface to knowledge and tools. According to McKinsey, by 2025 adoption had crossed a threshold that matters for history, not just headlines: more than three‑quarters of organizations report using AI in at least one business function, and 71% say they regularly use generative AI in at least one function. That breadth marks a cultural shift from experiments to capability building.

This widespread use has not yet meant maturity. According to that same McKinsey study, Only about 1 % of executives describe their generative AI rollouts as mature and just 17% say 5% or more of their EBIT over the past year is attributable to generative AI. The signal is clear: value shows up when companies redesign workflows and governance, not when they simply add a model. In fact, McKinsey’s 2025 survey ties the largest bottom‑line impact to reworking processes and establishing clear oversight for AI.

Capital followed the momentum. U.S. private AI investment reached roughly $109 billion in 2024, according to Stanford’s AI Index Report, widening America’s lead and underscoring that this moment is an economic reshaping, not a passing fad. At the same time, the cost to use capable models fell dramatically. Inference prices for models at roughly GPT‑3.5 performance dropped about 280‑fold between late 2022 and late 2024, which is why AI features are appearing inside every workflow product you touch. Cheaper inference changes the calculus from “can we afford to try this” to “why are we not trying this everywhere it is safe.”

Another break with the past is how AI acts. Traditional machine learning predicted; humans took action. The emerging pattern is agentic AI: systems that plan, call tools and APIs, coordinate with other agents, and take steps toward a goal within guardrails. Benchmarks like RE‑Bench show a mixed but promising picture. In short time horizons, top systems can outperform human experts by about four times, yet over longer horizons humans still win by roughly two to one. That is exactly what you would expect in 2025. Agents are fast pattern machines. Humans still lead in extended context, ethics, and messy trade‑offs. Analysts now treat agentic AI as a top strategic trend, which signals that enterprises are moving from demos to deployment playbooks.

If you step back, the arc is straightforward. AI spent decades learning to perceive and predict. The 2010s made it useful at scale. The early 2020s made it generative and collaborative. 2025 is making it operational: cheap enough to use widely, adopted across functions, still immature in many places, but already reshaping how work gets done. The next chapter is not about bigger models alone. It is about rewiring decisions, embedding guardrails, and teaching systems to explain themselves so people trust the actions they take. That is how a field becomes an infrastructure.

How AI Fits Into Both DX and IX

AI’s role shifts across the two eras. In Digital Transformation it amplifies visibility and efficiency so people can see, understand, and coordinate. In Intelligence Transformation it becomes the decisioning fabric that plans, acts, and learns inside your rules, with people supervising ethics, risk, and exceptions. Think of DX as digitizing the inputs that support judgment, and IX as selectively digitizing the judgment itself within clear guardrails and full audit.

DX slogan: “The digital era makes data visible and processes digital.”
IX slogan: “The intelligence era makes systems think, learn, and decide.”

A useful mental model is the loop from observe to act. DX excels at observe and orient, which is why dashboards, unified data models, and automated workflows were the signature wins of the last decade. IX completes the loop by deciding and acting inside policy, then learning from outcomes so the next decision is better. The technology is different, but the real shift is managerial: from endless status meetings to verifiable outcomes, from heroic firefighting to well-governed reflexes.

Digital Transformation outcomes AI helps deliver

  • Context-rich operational visibility: AI aggregates streaming and historical data into entity-centric views so teams act from the same truth.

  • Workflow automation: AI identifies repetitive patterns and triggers, then orchestrates tasks and handoffs so people focus on exceptions.

  • Centralized monitoring: AI classifies signals, ranks alerts by impact and likelihood, and routes incidents to the right resolver while suppressing noise.

  • Digital traceability: AI links product, process, and change records across systems to build end to end lineage for quality and compliance.

  • Real-time performance metrics: AI computes and forecasts KPIs, flags variance drivers, and suggests corrective actions that keep targets on track.

  • Enterprise data governance: AI assists with data discovery, quality checks, metadata enrichment, access policy enforcement, and lineage so analytics remain trustworthy at scale.

Intelligence Transformation use cases AI enables

  • Automated decision-making: Within explicit guardrails, AI selects and executes next-best actions, records outcomes, and escalates when uncertainty or risk exceeds thresholds.

  • Prescriptive recommendations: AI ranks concrete actions with predicted impact, rationale, and confidence that are tailored to the user’s role and current constraints.

  • Behavioral predictive modeling: AI anticipates how customers, suppliers, machines, and employees will respond to choices and schedules so you can intervene proactively.

  • Self-optimizing workflows: AI reorders steps, parameters, and approvals in flight based on real-time signals and policy so the process continuously improves.

  • Dynamic resource allocation: AI reallocates labor, materials, capacity, and energy to the highest-value use as conditions change, balancing cost, service, and risk.

  • Adaptive system learning: AI retrains models, updates rules, and refines policies from observed outcomes, with human oversight to lock in gains and prevent drift.

These are not the only plays. The lists are much longer. They are the big levers that usually move profit, safety, and customer experience.

Where and How to Begin your Intelligence Transformation Journey

Most organizations do not fail at intelligence because of models. They stall because no one owns the decision, the guardrails are fuzzy, and the loop from data to action is not closed. The fastest path forward is not a bigger lake or a broader pilot. It is a smaller, sharper target that proves value and builds trust. Start where outcomes are frequent, measurable, and governed. Let success pull you to the next decision rather than pushing AI everywhere at once.

Step 1: Map and rank the decisions, not the datasets.

Write a decision catalog that names the recurring calls your business makes, how often they occur, the latency you can tolerate, the inputs required, the constraints that apply, and the single person accountable for each decision. Prioritize three decisions that happen hundreds or thousands of times a month, sit inside clear policies, and have obvious economics if you get them right or wrong. Examples include routing a work order, rescheduling after a machine fault, allocating inventory to orders, or approving a concession. For each, define success up front: target impact, acceptable risk, and acceptance criteria that leadership signs. This focus prevents “AI tourism” and forces alignment on what good looks like before any model is trained.

Step 2: Build the guardrails and a minimal closed loop.

Before choosing algorithms, encode the rules of the road: hard constraints, safe operating ranges, segregation of duties, and escalation thresholds. Connect the loop end to end so the system can observe signals, orient with context, decide with policy plus a simple model, act through a real system of record, and then write back outcomes for learning. Run in shadow mode beside humans for a few weeks so you can compare recommendations with actual choices without taking production risk. Require every recommendation or action to show its rationale, confidence, and links to policy so operators can see why the system chose a path and where it stayed within limits. Treat explainability and audit as first-class features, not add-ons, because trust is the currency that buys adoption.

Step 3: Operate a decision factory and scale what proves out.

Graduate in stages from recommendations, to human-approved actions, to tightly bounded automation where the economics and safety are verified. Stand up repeatable plumbing so this becomes a capability, not a one-off: feature pipelines, model and policy registries, evaluation harnesses, rollout and rollback controls, drift monitoring, post-decision reviews, and a clear kill switch. Measure what matters to the business and make it visible: time to right decision, decision yield, intervention rate, variance reduction, and policy violations prevented. Name owners for the decision, the model, the policy, and the control so accountability sticks. Use these gates to fund and scale the loops that deliver outcomes and retire the ones that do not. Over time your meetings shift from debating dashboards to adjudicating trade-offs the system surfaces, and your organization learns to decide better every week.

References:

Jeff Winter
Next

When the Tool You Love Is Secretly Holding You Back