Quick Win Vs. Quick Fix

Let’s talk about the most dangerous type of progress: the kind that feels like progress but quietly makes everything worse.

I’m talking about the difference between a quick fix and a quick win.

At a glance, they’re nearly indistinguishable.
Both are fast.
Both get something off your plate.
Both make you look like a hero… for a moment

But over time, the difference is massive.

I’ve seen digital transformation efforts where the entire architecture was built on "temporary" patches.
A little script here. A manual workaround there.
A tool meant for six users being jury-rigged to handle 600.
And the best part?
Everyone knows it’s duct tape and bubble gum—but no one wants to be the one to pull the tape off.

That’s the hidden cost of a quick fix.
It creates false progress and future problems.

Meanwhile, a quick win is a small solution to a real problem that aligns with a long-term strategy. It builds momentum instead of buying time.

The Quick Fix Trap

A quick fix is reactive. It’s what you do when the fire alarm is blaring and the easiest thing is to silence it… not trace the wiring fault that caused it.

It’s adding more spreadsheets instead of integrating systems.
It’s spinning up another standalone dashboard because your core platform doesn’t give you what you need.
It’s hiring a consultant to “own” a problem that should be solved with process redesign.

Quick fixes are friction reducers, not value creators.
And often, they’re so well-intentioned that no one even questions them.

But stack enough of them together, and suddenly your digital transformation starts to feel more like an archeological dig—layer after layer of patches, workarounds, bandaids, and abandoned experiments.

And now? Every change you want to make is harder.
Because the systems don’t talk.
The people don’t trust.
And the complexity is too fragile to touch.

The Power of a Quick Win

Quick wins are different. They may be fast, but they are never frantic.
They are deliberate, strategic, and—most importantly—aligned.

A true quick win doesn’t just make a problem go away.
It makes the next problem easier to solve.

It earns trust with frontline workers because it improves their day.
It builds credibility with leadership because it moves a real needle.
And it gives your transformation momentum, which is more valuable than budget, more contagious than urgency, and more necessary than perfection.

Here’s the paradox:
Quick wins are still “quick”—but they take longer to think about.
They require saying, “Wait… is this going to help us build toward the bigger goal, or just buy us another 30 days?”

Three Rules for Getting it Right

So how do you build a culture that pursues real progress instead of convenient patches?

Here are three principles I’ve found that separate high-performing teams from those constantly running in circles:

1. Never confuse motion with momentum.

   Motion is easy to create. You can move the needle on activity without moving the business.
   Momentum only comes when each action lays the groundwork for the next one.
   Quick fixes create motion. Quick wins create motion with direction.

   Ask: Is this solving something fundamental, or just silencing a symptom?

2. Every fix has a cost—even if you don't see it right away.

   Every time you patch instead of solve, you're creating a hidden tax on the future.
   It shows up in onboarding. In training. In change resistance. In manual rework. In tech debt that strangles agility.

   You wouldn’t build a house on sand because it’s faster to pour.

   Don’t build a strategy on exceptions because they’re faster to implement.

   Ask: What will this decision cost us six months from now?

3. Define progress in terms of simplification, not just completion.

   Quick fixes almost always make your architecture more complex.
   Quick wins, done right, simplify the system. They remove steps. They clarify roles. They make workflows more elegant and less tribal.

   The best quick wins aren't just solutions. They're design corrections.

   Ask: Did we just finish something—or did we improve something?

Quick wins and quick fixes both live in the same zip code. But one builds a bridge. The other builds a detour.And in a world where complexity compounds and technology accelerates, the ability to spot the difference may be one of the most important leadership skills we can cultivate.

---